Timeless Archives

The Role of Mercenaries in Ancient Greece: Shaping Warfare and Society

Title: The Use of Mercenaries in Ancient Greece: Factors and PerspectivesThe history of ancient Greece is filled with tales of heroic battles and strife, with rival city-states vying for supremacy. Amidst this complex political landscape, the use of mercenaries emerged as a significant factor in shaping the fate of Greek civilization.

In this article, we will explore the various factors influencing the use of mercenaries in ancient Greece, as well as the perspectives of Greek philosophers on the pros and cons of employing these hired soldiers.

Factors influencing the use of mercenaries in Ancient Greece

Complex framework of rival city-states and alliances

In the fiercely competitive world of ancient Greece, rival city-states constantly sought to expand their power and influence. These city-states, such as Athens and Sparta, were often engaged in alliances with smaller polities.

This complex framework led to a constant need for military support, prompting the use of mercenaries to fill the gaps in manpower. These soldiers-for-hire provided a flexible and readily available resource for city-states, enabling them to navigate the intricacies of geopolitical relationships.

Prejudice against mercenaries in Greek society

Ancient Greek society held a deep-seated prejudice against mercenaries, viewing them as inferior to civic-minded citizens who fought for their state out of duty. This prejudice stemmed from the strong citizen-state relationship that Greeks held in high regard.

Hiring mercenaries was seen as an admission of weakness and an affront to the traditional notions of citizenship. However, as the city-states grappled with the demands of prolonged warfare, they were forced to adapt and employ mercenaries despite societal reservations.

Pros and cons of mercenaries according to the Ancient Greeks

Negative views of mercenaries by ancient Greek philosophers

Renowned philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle expressed their disdain for the use of mercenaries. Plato believed that relying on hired soldiers undermined the unity and strength of a city-state.

He argued that mercenaries lacked the loyalty and dedication necessary for the defense of the polis, as their allegiance could easily shift towards the highest bidder. Aristotle, too, criticized mercenaries, highlighting the detrimental impact their presence had on the moral fiber of society.

Increasing usage of mercenaries in ancient Greece

Despite the reservations of philosophers, the use of mercenaries in ancient Greece continued to grow. The brutal Peloponnesian War, fought between Athens and Sparta, marked a turning point in the adaptation of mercenaries.

As the war dragged on, the need for specialized troops and skilled fighters became increasingly essential. City-states began to rely on mercenaries for their military expertise, making them an integral part of Greek warfare.

In conclusion, the use of mercenaries in ancient Greece was influenced by the complex dynamics of rival city-states and alliances, as well as societal prejudice against hired soldiers. Philosophers like Plato and Aristotle expressed negative views towards mercenaries, fearing their impact on the unity and moral fabric of the city-states.

Nevertheless, during times of prolonged conflict, the necessity and practicality of hiring mercenaries led to their increased usage in Greek warfare. By understanding these factors and perspectives, we gain valuable insights into the strategic choices made by the ancient Greeks and the challenges they faced in maintaining their power and influence.


– Jones, A. H.

M. (1999).

The Greek City-State: A Sourcebook. Oxford University Press.

– Luraghi, N. (2006).

The Ancient Messenians: Constructions of Ethnicity and Memory. Cambridge University Press.

– Thucydides. (1972).

The Peloponnesian War. Penguin Classics.

Social and class barriers to the adoption of mercenaries

Dominance of hoplites and traditional warrior ethos

In ancient Greece, the dominant military force was the hoplites, heavily armored citizen-soldiers who fought with spears and shields in a tight formation called a phalanx. The warrior ethos of the hoplites emphasized bravery, discipline, and self-sacrifice for the greater good of the polis.

This traditional mindset presented a barrier to the adoption of mercenaries. Hoplites, who fought for their city-state out of duty and loyalty, viewed mercenaries as less honorable fighters.

The citizen-soldier identity was deeply ingrained in Greek society, reinforcing the belief that only citizens who willingly defended their homeland were worthy of respect and recognition. This created a social distinction between the hoplites and mercenaries, making it difficult for city-states to fully embrace the use of hired soldiers.

Xenophobia and distrust of foreign mercenaries

Xenophobia, the fear and distrust of foreigners, was another significant hurdle to the adoption of mercenaries in ancient Greece. Greek city-states were often suspicious of outsiders, believing that foreign mercenaries might not have the same loyalty to their cause.

This skepticism was rooted in the belief that mercenaries, driven solely by monetary gain, could easily switch sides or betray their employers. Additionally, Greek society valued the concept of philia (friendship or loyalty), which was often seen as stronger among fellow citizens than between a citizen and a foreign mercenary.

The fear of treachery and the perceived lack of shared bonds with foreign mercenaries further fueled the distrust and resistance to their use.

Famous Greek mercenaries of Ancient Greece

Greek mercenaries (Arcadians, Cretan Archers, Rhodian Slingers)

While the use of foreign mercenaries was common in ancient Greece, Greek city-states also employed their own native warriors as mercenaries. Among the famous Greek mercenaries were the Arcadians, renowned for their skills as heavy infantry.

Due to the resource limitations of their homeland, many Arcadians sought employment as mercenaries, offering their expertise in combat and their reputation for courage. Another group of Greek mercenaries highly sought after were the Cretan Archers.

With their exceptional archery skills and knowledge of mountainous terrain, the Cretans were valued for their ability to provide ranged support in battles. They were considered some of the most skilled archers of their time and were frequently hired by various Greek city-states.

The Rhodian Slingers, hailing from the island of Rhodes, were experts in slingshot warfare. Rhodian mercenaries were known for their accuracy and range, utilizing the art of slinging stones to devastating effect.

Their specialized skill set made them valuable assets for both attacking and defending forces. Other mercenaries (Thracians, Scythians, Celts)

Foreign mercenaries also played a significant role in ancient Greek warfare.

Thracians, hailing from the region of Thrace, were highly sought after for their fierce combat skills and light infantry tactics. Known for their fearsome warriors and their enduring stamina, Thracian mercenaries were particularly valued as shock troops and skirmishers.

Scythian mercenaries, originating from the steppes of Eastern Europe, were admired for their equestrian skills and mastery of horse archery. These nomadic warriors brought unparalleled mobility and versatility to the battlefield, becoming indispensable assets for Greek city-states seeking cavalry support.

Celtic tribes, hailing from various parts of Europe, also provided formidable mercenaries. With their larger-than-life appearances and renowned fighting prowess, Celtic mercenaries were often hired as elite shock troops.

The Celts’ ferocity and fearlessness struck terror into the hearts of their enemies and made them invaluable additions to Greek armies. In conclusion, the adoption of mercenaries in ancient Greece faced social and class barriers due to the dominance of hoplites and the traditional warrior ethos, as well as the xenophobia and distrust of foreign mercenaries.

However, Greek city-states overcame these obstacles and employed both native and foreign mercenaries to enhance their military capabilities. From the skilled Greek mercenaries, like the Arcadians, Cretan Archers, and Rhodian Slingers, to formidable foreign warriors, such as the Thracians, Scythians, and Celts, these hired soldiers left an indelible mark on ancient Greek warfare, shaping its course and outcomes.


– Hammond, N. G.

L. (2001).

A History of Greece to 322 B.C. Cambridge University Press. – Hull, G.

(2019). The Hellenistic World: Using Coins as Sources.

Cambridge University Press. – Sekunda, N., & McBride, A.

(1996). The Thracians: 700 BC-AD 46.

Osprey Publishing.

Changing dynamics and impact of mercenaries in ancient Greek warfare

of peltasts and their impact on traditional hoplite warfare

The introduction of peltasts, light infantry armed with a small shield called a pelte, had a profound impact on the traditional hoplite warfare. Unlike the heavily armored hoplites, peltasts were more mobile and relied on speed and maneuverability rather than sheer defensive strength.

They excelled at hit-and-run tactics, harassing enemy formations and disrupting their cohesion. This shift in tactics brought about by peltasts forced hoplite armies to adapt their strategies.

The rigid phalanx formation, with its emphasis on maintaining a solid line of shields, was susceptible to the swift attacks and evasive maneuvers of peltasts. To counter this new threat, hoplite armies started incorporating more light infantry units, such as peltasts, into their own formations, integrating them with the traditional hoplites for a more flexible and versatile force.

Socio-economic and military changes facilitated by mercenaries

The use of mercenaries in ancient Greece not only changed the military fabric but also triggered socio-economic transformations. Employing mercenaries required substantial financial resources to pay for their services.

City-states had to adapt their economic systems, often resorting to taxation and increased trade to generate the necessary funds. This led to the growth of commerce and a more monetized society, with mercenaries serving as catalysts for economic development.

Furthermore, the influence of mercenaries extended beyond their services on the battlefield. As these hired soldiers traveled from city-state to city-state, they brought with them diverse cultural influences and innovations in military tactics.

Their experiences in different regions exposed them to various styles of warfare, which they incorporated into their own strategies. The resulting cross-pollination of ideas and techniques contributed to the evolution of Greek military doctrines and shaped the future of ancient warfare.

Conclusion on the role of mercenaries in ancient Greece

Shifting views on mercenaries and their significance in ancient Greece

Throughout ancient Greek history, views on mercenaries were not static but evolved in response to societal and geopolitical changes. Initially, there was prejudice against mercenaries, as they were seen as inferior to the citizen-soldiers who fought for their city-state out of duty.

However, as the realities of prolonged warfare set in, city-states were forced to pragmatically adapt and employ mercenaries to augment their forces. Over time, pragmatic considerations surpassed societal biases, and the significance of mercenaries became more widely recognized.

Greek city-states began to appreciate the specialized skills and military expertise that mercenaries brought to the battlefield, acknowledging their valuable contributions to combat effectiveness.

Contributions of mercenaries to warfare in ancient Greece

The contributions of mercenaries to ancient Greek warfare were far-reaching. They brought diverse skill sets, innovations in tactics, and new weapons to the battlefield.

The presence of mercenaries introduced a level of professionalism, discipline, and efficiency that complemented the traditionally citizen-based armies. Moreover, mercenaries played a crucial role in the constant adaptation and transformation of Greek warfare.

As they traveled across different regions and fought for various city-states, they absorbed and disseminated the lessons learned from each conflict, influencing the evolution of military strategies and tactics. Greek warfare became more dynamic, incorporating the strengths of different cultures and adopting new approaches based on the experiences and expertise of mercenaries.

In conclusion, the role of mercenaries in ancient Greece was marked by shifting views and significant contributions. While initially met with prejudice and suspicion, the pragmatic need for specialized troops and military expertise led to their widespread adoption.

Mercenaries played a crucial role in shaping the changing dynamics of Greek warfare through their impact on traditional hoplite tactics, socio-economic changes, and the cross-pollination of military ideas. Their presence not only diversified the battlefield but also contributed to the evolution of Greek military doctrines, leaving an indelible mark on ancient warfare in the Mediterranean.


– Cawkwell, G. L.

(1994). Thucydides and the Peloponnesian War.

Routledge. – Sabin, P., van Wees, H., & Whitby, M.

(2008). The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Warfare.

Cambridge University Press. – Tritle, L.

A. (2011).

A New History of the Peloponnesian War. Wiley-Blackwell.

In conclusion, the use of mercenaries in ancient Greece was influenced by complex factors such as the rivalries between city-states, societal prejudices, and the need for specialized military tactics. Despite initial resistance and disdain, the pragmatic necessity of hiring mercenaries led to their increasing adoption and integration into Greek warfare.

The introduction of peltasts disrupted traditional hoplite formations, pushing for tactical adaptations. The employment of mercenaries also brought about socio-economic changes and facilitated the exchange of military innovations.

This reveals the dynamic nature of ancient Greek warfare, where the significance of mercenaries went beyond prejudices and became crucial in shaping battle dynamics. The lessons learned from their experiences and their contributions to military evolution mark their enduring impact on the history of ancient warfare.

Popular Posts